Information Technology Ecosystem in South Africa

Young Developers deep in thought at a PSTEM Training Session

Information Technology: Young Developers deep in thought at a PSTEM Foundation Training Session

First, a disclaimer. This post is by no means a definitive guide of the Information Technology Ecosystem in South Africa but rather an attempt to put all the IT role players into a structure that represents an ecosystem for all observers and those actively involved in the ecosystem to understand.

As such, comments, corrections and additions are welcome and encouraged as it will be updated periodically to reflect the changing ecosystem. Also, this is limited to Information Technology and excludes the Telecommunications part.

I would imagine that the ecosystem is not much different in other parts of the continent (Africa) as such, to make this a little bit more interesting I shall touch on the sometimes “thorny” subject of black representation in the IT ecosystem in South Africa.

Lastly, this first draft is written without editing, so : – P to the spelling and grammar “Nazis”.

The IT ecosystem in South Africa is split into different parts which can be summarized as follows:

  • The medium to large multinational technology companies (mostly European, Asian and North American) based in South Africa.
  • The South African and Non-South African technology products distributors. They are typically licensed by the multinationals and other local technology manufacturers or software development companies to “distribute” their products to South African resellers and in some cases to large corporate and government customers.
  • Large South African (publicly listed and private) “Systems Integration” companies who are most times the chosen “Premier” partners / Value Added Resellers (VARs) of the multinationals; e.g. Dimension Data, Business Connexion, Integr8,  Datacentrix etc.
  • Small to Medium IT “Solutions” / VAR / Resellers who mostly buy and resell multinational tech and add their services to offer their customers more value and a unique selling proposition.
  • Technology and Internet Innovators and Startups, companies that develop their own technology and then sell it. This excludes “new” companies / startups that resell multinational technology as they are merely resellers or VARs.
  • Non Profit Organisations involved in technology innovation and training. These involve technology hubs, some government sponsored technology innovation centers and other organisations involved in technology training and assisting technology startups.
  • Government Departments and Parastatals involved directly in the development of policies for the IT sector and in some cases in the provision of IT services.

Now, looking at the ecosystem as described above I will attempt to answer the question of “black representation” in the sector.

First, we need to define what “representation” means and decided for this first draft to look at it from the following points of view: Ownership, Technical skills / Professionals / Engineers  Representation (the guys who do the work) and Management Level representation, i.e. CIOs, CTOs, IT Managers, etc.

Ownership

Another disclaimer specific to ownership, I have not recently read the BEE or BBBEE charcter with regards to the ICT Sector and the ICT Charter Website was last updated in 2007.

Medium to Large Multinational Companies – most are private companies and in the absence of more detailed information I assume the majority are foreign majority owned. Also, again in the absence of accurate data, anecdotal evidence suggests that they are among the largest “Technology Companies” in the country with regards to revenue.

Distributors – this is difficult to measure as you get some small technology products distributors, “below the radar”, and some large. So again, most being private, some are South African owned and some are not and you have some complying with general BEE codes, i.e. at minimum  25% ownership by “Previously Disadvantaged Individual/s” (PDIs). Although this might be said to address the black ownership question, some of the equity deals are not as straightforward as they are reported to be. Oft times this ownership is “paper based”, i.e. some of the ownership is not realized until such time the “BEE partner’s” dividend payouts, profit generated, sales generated have “paid” for his / her share ownership equivalent by a certain deadline. Such agreements are private and models can differ and there are exceptions where the BEE partner has paid for (in full or part) in cash. So on paper, in order to get a “good” BEE scorecard, the ownership of most distributors is at 25.1% Black ownership.

Medium to Large System Integration Companies – very similar situation in ownership as distributors above as far as black ownership is concerned. There are exceptions in cases where some have been majority black owned from inception.  Or in some cases have been black owned through acquisition.

Small & Medium IT Resellers and VARs – these are typically founder owned and managed and range in size from the micro (1 person) to medium sized. Black representation? Difficult to measure but one would imagine distributors and the vendors (multinationals) have a good idea of ownership of this “sector” of the IT ecosystem in South Africa as most are partners / resellers of their products and are registered with them. Also, there’s a lot of “churn” at the lower end (micro). A typical scenario is a professional resigns and re-contracts to previous clients but in a few years company closes shop, gets acquired etc. Also, some are born as a result of a single opportunity identified based on personal relationships. At the lower end you get a lot of black owned companies, but they don’t turn over a significant amount of money, typically in the 1st three years just enough to take care of the owners needs, tend to subcontract most if not all work.

Technology and Internet Innovators and Startups - Given that there is always new Internet and Technology startups, it is difficult to measure participation based on the mentioned demographics. So, based on purely anecdotal evidence of startups who are getting attention both in the ecosystem and the media, it is interesting to note most startup activity (based on this criteria) geographically “appears” and can be perceived to be concentrated in the Western Cape, with a good number involved with the Silicon Cape Initiative.

 Information Technology Professionals in South Africa

There’s a great representation of black people as far as IT professionals go. I don’t have the exact or estimate numbers and at time of writing just don’t have the time to research them.

The best of these black IT professionals don’t only work for IT companies (e.g. Multinationals, System Integrators) but are also scooped up by large corporates, government and parastatals and they end up in their IT departments. Typically, apart from their skills and experience, given South Africa’s Employment Equity guidelines and BEE guidelines, they come with the added “bonus” of improving a company’s BEE Scorecard. This is sometimes sad, but true.

There’s also an interesting trend that is cyclical (anecdotal evidence), currently the skills most black IT professionals are training in or getting certified in is “business analysis”, “process analysis”, “data analysis / Business Intelligence”, “Business Process Re-engineering”, “IT Project Management” and similar.

The reasons why this is so could vary, it could be because of demand but there’s also a bit of “chasing the money” which to a certain extent explains why there aren’t so many “prominent” black owned technology startups since the bulk of those who could be innovating are “chasing the money”. Nothing wrong with this, just an observation.

I mention “chasing the money” because before the current trend of the above mentioned skills, there was a great dea; of black professionals chasing the MCSE, Cisco Networking, SAP Consultant, basically brand / product specific ICT certifications because that’s where it was perceived the “money was”. PLEASE NOTE: this is anecdotal, although I believe it is relatively accurate.

So, as far as black professionals in IT go, they are there, majority are working in corporate and public sector South Africa.

Management

I separated “representation of black skills in management” from the technical skills portion because to get into IT Management you need to have had IT work experience and the situation is different here.

Again, there is relatively good black representation although in this area you get a lot of “pale males” once again because to be CTO, CIO IT Manager you need experience.

What you also find with the Black IT Managers is a relatively high employee turnover rate whereby because the pool of these managers is relatively small, they tend to be changing jobs regularly as they seek better opportunities.

Challenges

The biggest challenge in my view (opinion) is politics.

Politics in the sense that despite BEE’s best intentions, it is indirectly hampering technology innovation and entrepreneurship amongst black IT professionals as given the choice between a good “secure” salary and challenging themselves to use their skills to solve problems or be enterprising, they go with the job.

Also, BEE hampers  innovation indirectly amongst the resellers etc. in a sense that most of these companies adopt a “checkbox BEE” mentality whereby they ensure that they “check” all the correct BEE boxes on questionnaires and ensure that should a big corporate or government institution require to procure certain products / services they stand a better chance at getting that tender / contract. So instead of focusing on “solving problems” using technology and  innovating, the focus is now on “how do we win the tender / contract”.

Nothing new is created because from a political policy point of view there is no incentive to innovate or be enterprising.

The other challenge especially for black IT professionals and white IT professionals is a racial perception one. Black professionals believe their progress is stifled by “racist” white IT managers whilst white IT professionals have a perception that black IT professionals in South Africa are of a poor quality and sub-standard. Neither deals with this perception challenge head-on, both groups huddle (anecdotal) in their own corners and continue to fuel these perceptions.

Potential Solutions

Provide incentives for technology entrepreneurship and innovation, this has to come from government. Forget BEE scorecards focused on ownership etc. but include incentives for innovation and new technology startups.

Government being the largest IT buyer of hardware and software in South Africa it must be open to then buy “MADE IN SOUTH AFRICA” IT products. Not only provide incentives, but lead by example and buy the products as long as they are good and can compete with the best in the world.

Once the focus is shifted from ownership scorecards perhaps then many black startups will start to shift their focus from “chasing tenders and contracts” to developing  products that solve problems and then selling those products.

As far as the challenges around  professionals  go and what needs to be done, no one can dictate what a private company must do beyond the guidelines that are already available around affirmative action and BBBEE. This then boils down to each individual having an open and re-conciliatory mind and willing to accommodate the other  whilst not losing focus of business goals.

Early training of youth in Science, Maths and Programming similar to what Non Profit Organisations such as PSTEM Foundation is key. This addresses the skills shortage and in turn addresses the issue of not enough in-country technology skills available for employment in the long term.

Lottery Life

Most of us have a “Lottery” mentality to life, i.e. we want the “big score”, land the “big deal”, lose “a lot of weight in a short space of time”, find the perfect life partner “immediately”, get that “promotion” at work next month, drive that uber SUV next month, etc….you get the pattern?

Sit back for a minute and realise a small but SIGNIFICANT fact which goes something like this: -

If a ship on a long journey were to change its direction by just 1 degree, it would end up at a completely different destination even possibly on a different continent after the journey is completed. Now, tilting the ship’s “steering” by just 1 degree (given its size), in the short term you see NO results as 1 degree is an ignorable measurement considering the size of the ship, the ocean and the length of the journey.

BUT…

In the long term, the results are astonishing!

That’s how nature / universe works. Small, ignorable tweaks made today and followed through over the long term, make a HUGE difference. It is not a secret, it is not a special code that only the “Illuminati” know, it is a fact of life. You want to get fit, eat right, do exercise however little, long term you get fit.

This applies to EVERYTHING.

But why do we want “shortcuts”?

I blame our evolved brains, they are both an asset and a liability for animals with less evolved brains obey laws of nature diligently…yet we use ours even to our own detriment in the name of “Advancement and Progress”.

I am digressing.

The main point, small little tweaks that are ignorable today…big results in the future.

The Next Web 2013 Europe Conference – Amsterdam

Life Paradox

The “Butterfly Effect” as it is colloquially known, is “the phenomenon whereby a small change at one place in a complex system can have large effects elsewhere, e.g., a butterfly flapping its wings in Rio de Janeiro might change the weather in Chicago)”. Now, our lives are filled with many events and decisions, some bad, some good.

Yet, both the good and bad choices lead us to the moment in time that we are at, at this very nanosecond. Altering even a minute detail, as the butterfly effect suggests, could dramatically alter the results thus it is logical to conclude that even the smallest tweak in the past could have resulted in a different “present”.

So, when in a “successful” position, a “victorious” outcome, isn’t it fair to suggest that you are at that position / outcome because of the good and the bad events / decisions? Thus, isn’t it also fair to suggest even though they appeared bad decisions at the time, bad events when they happened, that you should be thankful for them as they gave you an outcome you desired?

Lastly, if eventually you achieve the desired outcome, aren’t we mostly geniuses in hindsight without realizing it at the time?

Embrace the good, embrace the bad. They both serve a purpose, different sides of the same coin.